The White House is actively evaluating a range of options for acquiring Greenland, including the possibility of military intervention. Senior officials have confirmed that discussions are taking place regarding acquiring the territory from Denmark or forming a compact of free association. President Donald Trump views the acquisition as a critical national security issue, aiming to reach a resolution before the end of his term.
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt stated that President Trump has made it clear that acquiring Greenland is a priority for the United States. She emphasized the need to deter adversaries in the Arctic region and noted that military action remains an option available to the Commander in Chief.
The Danish government has expressed strong opposition to any potential military move. Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned that such an action could jeopardize the NATO alliance. “If the United States chooses to attack another NATO country militarily, then everything stops,” she told local media, referring to NATO’s Article 5, which states that an armed attack against one member is considered an attack against all.
Greenland, a semi-autonomous territory within the Kingdom of Denmark, has become a focal point of international discourse, particularly following comments made by White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller. He asserted that it is the formal position of the U.S. government that Greenland should be part of the United States. President Trump echoed this sentiment over the weekend, stating that the U.S. needs Greenland for strategic purposes.
The U.S. already operates a military base in Greenland, which could enhance its strategic importance in the region. The renewed interest in Greenland follows the U.S. military’s involvement in Venezuela, where it recently captured Nicolás Maduro and indicated plans to manage the country temporarily.
As discussions continue, the implications of acquiring Greenland extend beyond territorial interests. The potential for military intervention raises concerns about the stability of international alliances and the geopolitical landscape. The Danish Embassy in Washington has not commented on the latest developments.
The situation remains fluid, with international responses likely to shape the future of Greenland and its relationship with both Denmark and the United States. As the White House navigates this sensitive issue, the balance between national security and diplomatic relations will be paramount in determining the outcome.