The implications of divorce on Social Security benefits are often misunderstood, particularly among women who have dedicated years to caregiving. A recent visit to the Social Security Administration (SSA) by Catherine Berresheim, a divorced mother and educator, brought to light the stark reality many face when navigating this complex system after ending a long-term marriage.

Berresheim, who divorced her husband after 30 years of marriage, is grappling with the financial uncertainties that accompany her new status. At the age of 53, she filed for divorce, primarily due to her ex-husband’s desire to terminate his alimony obligations as he approached retirement age. During her appointment at the SSA, she learned that her benefits would be significantly less than anticipated, which ignited fears of financial insecurity.

Inside the SSA office, Berresheim faced a representative who explained her benefits situation. She was informed that she would not be able to claim the full amount her ex-husband earned. Instead, she would need to rely on his record to supplement her own primary insurance amount. The representative calculated that Berresheim would be entitled to $1,600 monthly at retirement — a combination of her $1,200 benefit and an additional $400 derived from her ex-husband’s earnings.

The stark reality of this figure, amounting to only $19,200 annually, threw Berresheim into a state of distress. She recalled her fears of becoming financially destitute, likening her potential future to that of a “bag lady.” Her concerns are not unfounded; the poverty rate for divorced women aged 65 and older stands at over 19%, significantly higher than their married counterparts at 12%.

As Berresheim reflected on her life choices, she considered the sacrifices made during her marriage. Time spent as a stay-at-home mother meant she had limited opportunities to contribute to her retirement savings. The social security system, she noted, does not adequately compensate women for their years of unpaid caregiving. The implications of this ongoing issue are profound, especially in light of increasing divorce rates among older adults, often referred to as the “Gray Divorce Revolution.”

Berresheim’s experience resonates with many women who find themselves facing the financial repercussions of their marital decisions. Her mother, who divorced in 1973, faced similar challenges. Despite her mother’s resilience, Berresheim recalls the hardships they endured, including reliance on government assistance and the struggle to make ends meet.

In a society that increasingly values women’s contributions, Berresheim advocates for reforms to the Social Security system. She argues that caregiving years should be recognized, similar to policies in European countries that allow for caregiver credits. Such changes could provide financial security for women who have devoted years to raising children and supporting families.

Reflecting on her journey, Berresheim expressed a sense of urgency for women to take proactive steps in securing their financial futures. She advises young mothers to consider their long-term financial independence, recommending that they limit time spent away from the workforce, invest in their own retirement accounts, and devise equitable financial plans with their spouses.

Ultimately, Berresheim’s story highlights the pressing need for a reevaluation of how Social Security benefits are allocated, particularly for divorced women. Without significant reform, many women will continue to face the daunting reality of financial insecurity in their later years, underscoring the importance of gender equality in the realm of retirement planning.

As Berresheim continues to navigate these challenges, she remains determined to advocate for change and empower other women to secure their financial independence. Through her experiences, it is clear that the intersection of divorce and Social Security requires deeper understanding and action to create a more equitable future for all women.