U.S. Representative Pat Ryan has condemned the decision by the Trump administration to allow the FBI to investigate six Democratic lawmakers. This inquiry stems from a video in which the lawmakers expressed their views on the obligation to refuse illegal orders. Ryan, a Democratic veteran representing the 19th Congressional District, described the move as a troubling escalation of political tensions.
In a statement released on March 15, 2024, Ryan emphasized that the lawmakers acted within their rights to free speech. The individuals under scrutiny include U.S. Senators Mark Kelly of Arizona and Elissa Slotkin of Michigan, as well as U.S. Representatives Jason Crow of Colorado, Maggie Goodlander of New Hampshire, and Chris Deluzio and Chrissy Houlahan from Pennsylvania. Notably, five of the six are former military personnel, and one is a former intelligence officer.
Ryan highlighted his criticism of both President Donald Trump and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth regarding military policies, labeling the inquiry a “dangerous escalation.” He stated, “They want to silence my fellow veterans and members of a coequal branch of government for saying that our oath to the Constitution comes first.”
Ryan further pointed out Trump’s extreme rhetoric, referencing a social media post in which the President suggested that the lawmakers’ actions could be considered sedition, stating it is “punishable by DEATH.” He expressed that such calls from the Commander-in-Chief are unacceptable, urging for a collective condemnation of this stance.
The inquiry into the lawmakers follows a social media video in which they urged U.S. troops to reject illegal orders. Reports indicate that the FBI has begun reaching out to the lawmakers to schedule interviews, suggesting a deeper investigation into the matter. This marks the second investigation related to the video, occurring shortly after the Pentagon announced a review of Senator Kelly for potential violations of military law.
The involvement of both federal law enforcement and military institutions in this context raises significant concerns regarding the politicization of these entities. Historically, they have remained apolitical, and the current situation signals a shift in this long-standing precedent. Ryan’s statement reflects a broader worry among lawmakers that the administration is willing to test legal boundaries against its critics, particularly those who hold office.
In response to the inquiries, U.S. Rep. Josh Riley, also from the 19th Congressional District, criticized the focus on the lawmakers, describing them as “some of the most patriotic people I know.” He argued that instead of targeting those who defend the Constitution, the President should acknowledge their service and prioritize pressing issues such as healthcare and housing costs.
As the situation unfolds, the implications of these inquiries on the relationship between military and political institutions remain to be seen. The actions taken by the FBI and Pentagon may have lasting effects on how lawmakers engage with military matters in the future, particularly when it comes to expressing dissent against governmental policies.