Sweden and Finland are actively advocating for more flexible emissions targets within the European Union. The two countries argue that their unique environmental conditions, particularly lower tree growth levels, could lead to severe economic repercussions if they are compelled to reduce forest harvesting for wood products.
Both nations are committed to contributing to the EU’s goal of achieving net zero emissions by 2050, which includes increasing the amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) sequestered by forests. However, they are currently on track to miss the EU’s Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF) targets for the periods 2021-2025 and 2026-2030.
Concerns Over Economic Impact
The Swedish and Finnish governments have expressed concerns that the current framework may impose unreasonable restrictions on their forestry sectors. On September 15, 2023, Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson stated on social media platform X that “the EU’s current framework for forest use… is a major problem and, if not revised, would lead to unreasonable and unjustified restrictions on Swedish forestry.” He emphasized that limiting large areas of Nordic forestry would be an ineffective approach.
The demand for wood products has surged, particularly in light of the ongoing war in Ukraine and its impact on supply chains. This situation has exacerbated the challenges both countries face in meeting EU targets, as climate change has further slowed tree growth in their forests.
Forestry’s Economic Role
Forests are a vital component of the economies of both Sweden and Finland, covering approximately 70% of their total land area. In Sweden, wood products account for over 10% of the nation’s exports, while in Finland, this figure approaches 20%. The forestry sector also provides employment for more than 200,000 individuals across both countries.
As the EU revises its climate policies, Sweden and Finland are urging for a more adaptable approach that considers their specific circumstances. They believe that a balanced strategy can support both environmental goals and economic stability in the region. The outcome of this lobbying effort will play a crucial role in determining the future of the forestry industries in both nations and their contributions to the EU’s climate objectives.