The Sulphur City Council decisively rejected two agreements for a proposed CO2 pipeline project on November 13, 2025. In a unanimous vote, the Council turned down the introduction of ordinances that would have permitted the city to enter lease and purchase agreements with **Lake Charles Methanol** for land intended for the **Lake Charles Methanol II** project.
The project aimed to produce low-carbon hydrogen via advanced natural gas reforming, subsequently converting it into Blue Methanol through permanent carbon capture and sequestration (CCS). Earlier this year, **Lake Charles Methanol** proposed leasing approximately **2.73 acres** of land adjacent to the city’s wastewater facilities at an annual rate of **$81,900**, while a sale agreement was on the table for **5.35 acres** at **$425,000**.
Mayor Mike Danahay noted that the project presented a potential financial opportunity for the city. The high appraisal of the land was a critical factor in the city’s assessment of the proposal. **Jennifer Thorn**, the city’s Finance Director, emphasized the administration’s commitment to due diligence in considering the offer. “From a financial stewardship standpoint, it would be irresponsible to dismiss this offer outright,” she stated.
Despite the potential financial benefits, numerous Sulphur residents expressed strong opposition to the agreements, citing concerns over environmental safety and public health. **Danny DiPetta** emerged as a prominent voice against the project, rallying community support to protect local interests and preserve what many residents consider “valuable acres.”
Shelia Broussard raised alarms about the long-term implications of the proposed lease, which could extend up to **40 years** with two potential **10-year** extensions. **Robin Thigpin** echoed these worries, highlighting the site’s proximity to local waterways and warning that further industrial activities could exacerbate existing contamination issues and hinder ongoing restoration efforts. “LCM has been bad neighbors since the beginning,” she remarked. “We don’t need to continue giving them a path forward.”
Adding to the opposition, **Louisiana State Representative Les Farnum** reminded attendees that the land was originally designated for the expansion of the city’s wastewater facilities. “That dream has not gone away,” he asserted.
Prior to the Council meeting, residents gathered in protest against the proposed project, demonstrating the community’s strong commitment to environmental preservation and local governance. The unanimous decision by the Sulphur City Council reflects the significant concerns voiced by the community and the complexities surrounding industrial development in the area.