Senator Mark Warner, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, expressed concerns about the state of the U.S. economy and the oversight of intelligence operations during an interview on “Face the Nation” with Margaret Brennan on September 7, 2025. Warner criticized the current administration’s approach to economic data and highlighted his lack of access to crucial intelligence meetings, raising alarms over national security implications.
Warner rejected the notion that economic data released by the United States is fundamentally flawed, asserting that the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) has long been viewed as the “gold standard” not just domestically, but internationally. He acknowledged that reforms could be beneficial but criticized the President for making leadership changes that he believes undermine data quality. “We’re down 80,000 manufacturing jobs since the beginning of his term,” Warner noted, emphasizing the tough job market for families and recent college graduates.
The discussion shifted to the impact of artificial intelligence on the job market, where Warner warned of potential job dislocations, particularly in sectors traditionally filled by college graduates. He reflected on past advice encouraging students to pursue careers in computer programming, stating that these positions may soon be among the first to face automation risks.
Brennan then inquired about the recent gathering of tech leaders at the White House, including Bill Gates and executives from Google and Apple, who praised President Donald Trump for his support of chip manufacturing. Warner clarified that the foundation for this development was laid by bipartisan legislation, specifically the Chips Infrastructure Act, which he co-sponsored with John Cornyn. He pointed out that while Trump has praised chip manufacturing, he has also criticized the act and taken contradictory actions, such as removing restrictions on exports to China.
Warner expressed his concerns about the implications of these contradictions for U.S. national security, stating, “How do we read this if we want to build American capacity… and make sure we maintain our lead against China?” He highlighted the risks of selling advanced chips to China while simultaneously advocating for U.S. chip manufacturing.
The conversation further delved into Warner’s oversight role in intelligence matters. He revealed that he had been blocked from attending a meeting at the National Geospatial Intelligence Agency, a significant breach of protocol given his position. Warner characterized this incident as unusual and connected it to a controversial figure, Laura Loomer, who has been criticized for her extremist views and who seems to hold sway within the current administration.
Brennan questioned Warner about Loomer’s influence, with Warner expressing disbelief at her involvement in intelligence matters. He stressed the importance of congressional oversight and warned that restricting access to intelligence operations compromises national security. “You want to talk about something that is dangerous, you restrict Congress’s ability to do oversight,” he said.
Additionally, Warner addressed military operations concerning drug interdiction efforts in Latin America. Responding to remarks by former colleague Marco Rubio, who justified military action against drug trafficking boats, Warner expressed his concerns about adherence to international laws during such operations. He emphasized the necessity for clear communication and briefing of intelligence operations to ensure safety and compliance with legal standards.
In summary, Warner’s remarks highlighted critical issues regarding economic conditions, job security amid technological advances, and the essential need for transparency and oversight in intelligence operations. His comments raise significant questions about the direction of U.S. policy and its implications for both the economy and national security.