In a significant shift for college football, FOX Sports’ RJ Young has unveiled his latest version of a 24-team College Football Playoff (CFP) bracket, igniting discussions about the postseason structure. The announcement comes in the wake of Notre Dame‘s decision to withdraw from bowl eligibility after being left out of the 12-team playoff format. This move by the Fighting Irish, led by head coach Marcus Freeman, is seen as a bold statement regarding their discontent with the current selection process.

Following their exclusion from the playoff, Notre Dame’s athletic director Pete Bevacqua expressed frustration over what he described as “permanent damage” to the school’s relationship with the Atlantic Coast Conference (ACC). Bevacqua stated, “We didn’t appreciate the fact that we were singled out repeatedly and compared to Miami…that’s just not something we chose to do.” This statement underscores the tension between Notre Dame and the ACC, as the Fighting Irish opted not to participate in any postseason activities.

Expanding the Playoff Field

The controversy surrounding Notre Dame’s exclusion has fueled calls for an expanded playoff system. The proposed 24-team format aims to include more teams and create a more equitable chance for success. According to Young, this model would allow for 18 automatic qualifiers: the top four teams from each of the Power 4 conferences and the two highest-ranked teams from the Group of 6. The remaining six spots would be filled based on the selection committee’s discretion.

Young’s analysis suggests that this expansion would provide opportunities for a broader range of teams, including traditional powerhouses and emerging contenders. The current selection process has faced criticism for favoring certain teams, and a larger bracket could mitigate these concerns. “This system offers a more democratic approach to identifying the best team,” Young noted, emphasizing the importance of every game in the regular season, particularly rivalry matchups.

How the 24-Team Bracket Would Function

The proposed format would feature a series of home games, enhancing the fan experience and allowing teams to leverage their home-field advantage. The top eight teams would receive byes, while teams seeded from ninth to sixteenth would host first-round games. Additionally, teams ranked seventeenth to twenty-fourth would need to play on the road for their opening matchups.

This model not only elevates the significance of conference championships but also provides additional pathways for teams to qualify for the postseason. Young’s analysis indicates that the current structure does not adequately reflect the competitive landscape of college football, where teams like Notre Dame have historically performed at a high level.

As the college football landscape evolves, the discussion surrounding playoff expansion remains a hot topic. The 24-team format, as envisioned by Young, could potentially reshape the postseason experience and ensure that deserving teams have the opportunity to compete for the national title. With the current playoff model facing scrutiny, the push for change is gaining momentum among fans, analysts, and athletic programs alike.

While the final structure of the College Football Playoff remains uncertain, the ongoing debates and proposals signal a transformative period for the sport. As teams gear up for the postseason, the call for a more inclusive and fair playoff system resonates louder than ever.