WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 20: Paul Ingrassia, White House Liaison to the Justice Department, left, announces the release of brothers Andrew and Matthew Valentin outside of the DC Central Detention Facility on January 20, 2025 in Washington, DC. President Donald Trump issued pardons to over 1500 people who were charged with crimes related to the event. (Photo by Pete Kiehart for The Washington Post via Getty Images)

The nomination of Paul Ingrassia as head of the Office of Special Counsel is in jeopardy following the emergence of text messages containing racist remarks. Leaked messages, first reported by Politico, reveal that Ingrassia, a former podcast host and current White House liaison to the Department of Homeland Security, made derogatory comments about Black individuals and expressed disdain for federal holidays celebrating their contributions.

In the group chat with Republican operatives, Ingrassia referred to a “Nazi streak” and suggested that celebrations such as Martin Luther King Jr. Day should be “tossed into the seventh circle of hell.” His comments included a slur for Black individuals and a call to eliminate all federal holidays associated with Black history, specifically stating that celebrations like Kwanzaa, Martin Luther King Jr. Day, and Juneteenth should be “eviscerated.” He further claimed that “Blacks behave that way because that’s their natural state” and disputed the notion that “all men are created equal.”

Ingrassia’s attorney, Edward Paltzik, contested the authenticity of the messages, asserting in a statement to Politico that “even if the texts are authentic, they clearly read as self-deprecating and satirical humor.”

Political Fallout from Racist Remarks

The allegations have prompted immediate backlash from Republican senators, with Senate Majority Leader John Thune of South Dakota suggesting the White House withdraw Ingrassia’s nomination. Thune stated, “He’s not gonna pass,” highlighting the growing opposition within his party.

At least three GOP senators from the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee—Rick Scott of Florida, Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, and James Lankford of Oklahoma—have indicated their disapproval of Ingrassia. With Democrats unified against him, the loss of even a few Republican votes would significantly jeopardize his confirmation.

Scott expressed his disapproval, stating, “I can’t imagine how anybody can be antisemitic in this country. It’s wrong.” This commentary reflects a broader concern among Republican lawmakers regarding the implications of Ingrassia’s remarks on their party’s reputation.

This incident is the latest in a series of controversies surrounding leaked texts within Republican circles. Earlier this month, a group chat among Young Republicans revealed similar racist language and jokes about the Holocaust. The National Young Republican Federation responded by condemning the language as “vile and inexcusable.”

Ingrassia’s nomination, initially seen as a strategic appointment by former President Donald Trump, now faces significant hurdles. As the Senate prepares for discussions, the implications of his comments may resonate far beyond the immediate confirmation process, potentially affecting the broader political landscape.