The highly anticipated comparison between the Nikon and Viltrox ultra-wide lenses has sparked interest among photographers seeking the best option for tight spaces or expansive landscapes. A recent video by photographer Alex Cooke provides an in-depth analysis of these two lenses, highlighting their distinct features and performance metrics. This examination is particularly relevant for those considering a purchase in this competitive segment of the market.
Performance Features and Design
Both lenses fall within the ultra-wide range but cater to different photographic needs. The Nikon lens offers a versatile zoom capability that extends to 30mm, equipped with a control ring and an autofocus switch. In contrast, the Viltrox features a fixed 14mm focal length, emphasizing simplicity and a lightweight design ideal for travel or long hikes.
Price is a crucial aspect of this comparison. The Nikon lens is positioned at the higher end of the market, while the Viltrox is considerably more affordable. Cooke notes a noticeable difference in weight, which plays a significant role when carrying equipment for extended periods. While the Nikon extends when zoomed to 14mm, it also requires larger filters with an 82mm thread, leading to higher accessory costs. The smaller 58mm thread of the Viltrox allows for more economical accessory options.
Autofocus and Sharpness Comparison
When evaluating autofocus performance, the Viltrox exhibits slightly quicker transitions from foreground to background. This can be particularly beneficial in dynamic shooting environments. Additionally, the lenses differ significantly in their minimum focus distances. The Viltrox can focus as close as 13 cm, enabling tighter shots of foreground details while maintaining a vast background. In contrast, the Nikon maintains a minimum focus distance of 28 cm, which restricts its ability to capture the same level of detail in close-up shots.
Tests conducted on a Nikon Z camera show both lenses perform well with face tracking, indicating that users can expect reliable performance in this area. Sharpness tests reveal subtle differences, particularly at f/4, where both lenses remain crisp. However, the Viltrox potentially edges out the Nikon in sharpness at the center of the frame. In corner sharpness, the Nikon takes a slight lead when wide open, but when stopped down to f/8, both lenses deliver clean, detailed results across the frame.
Photographers who prioritize versatility may find the Nikon lens advantageous due to its adjustable zoom range. This flexibility allows for varied compositions without the need for physical repositioning. On the other hand, if a photographer rarely crops and values quick sharing of images, the straightforward design of the Viltrox may be more appealing, particularly for those involved in hiking, travel, or urban photography.
Ultimately, each lens offers unique benefits catering to different styles and preferences. The Nikon lens is ideal for those who require a broader zoom range, while the Viltrox stands out for its lightweight construction and affordability. Both lenses deliver exceptional ultra-wide results when used with a Nikon full-frame Z camera, making them strong contenders in the marketplace. For a comprehensive overview, viewers are encouraged to watch the full video by Alex Cooke.