As awareness of global inequalities grows, a poignant commentary by Haitian poet Muriel Vieux on December 18, 2025, underscores the stark realities faced by many in developing nations. Vieux articulates the struggles of daily life in Haiti, contrasting them with the privileges enjoyed in wealthier countries, particularly the United States.
In her reflection, Vieux points out that many individuals in affluent countries remain largely unaware of the basic challenges that people in less developed regions endure. She highlights the absence of social safety nets in Haiti, such as unemployment benefits, pensions, and healthcare programs like Medicare and Medicaid. The severity of these issues is illustrated by the alarming frequency with which families are forced to place their children in orphanages due to financial constraints.
Vieux also emphasizes how common conveniences, like online banking and streaming services, are often unavailable in her country. She mentions popular platforms such as PayPal, Zelle, Cash App, and Venmo, which are taken for granted by those in wealthier nations. For many in Haiti, the limitations imposed by geographical and economic factors can feel suffocating.
The poet articulates frustration with the perception that boycotts of major retailers like Amazon are viable options for individuals in her circumstances. She notes that while some may choose to abstain from using these services, it does not account for the dire economic realities faced by people living in Haiti. The lack of alternative shopping options often leaves individuals with no choice but to rely on platforms that provide essential goods and services.
In a striking metaphor, Vieux compares the unpredictability of currency exchange rates to a suspenseful horror narrative, highlighting the anxiety that comes with managing limited financial resources. She explains that the daily struggles of individuals in Haiti, especially regarding basic needs such as fuel for hospitals, are often overshadowed by political maneuvers in other countries.
Furthermore, Vieux criticizes the perception that those living in wealthier countries can judge the choices of individuals in Haiti. She asserts that the moral high ground often taken by critics overlooks the fact that many in affluent nations have never contributed to the hardships faced by those in less fortunate circumstances.
Her writing serves as a call to action, urging readers to recognize the real-life implications of their decisions and the broader social dynamics at play. Vieux concludes with a plea for understanding and support, emphasizing that even small contributions can make a significant difference in the lives of those striving for a better future in Haiti.
As discussions around global inequality continue, Vieux’s insights shed light on the necessity of empathy and awareness in addressing the disparities that persist in today’s world.