UPDATE: A significant shift is underway in the NAS (Network Attached Storage) community as users are increasingly opting to build their own systems instead of relying on established brands like Synology. This trend is primarily fueled by dissatisfaction with recent restrictions that Synology has implemented for its products.
Long-time Synology users are feeling the pinch of new limitations, particularly the company’s decision to restrict third-party hard drive compatibility. Users report that only Synology-branded drives or those certified by the company will be supported on new models. This policy means limited drive health stats and an inability to add non-certified drives to storage pools, effectively stalling upgrades for many. The largest Synology drive available is a mere 20TB, leaving users like one former customer unable to expand their NAS beyond their current capacity of 22TB.
With many users outgrowing their existing setups, they are now looking towards custom-built NAS solutions. One former Synology user stated, “Building my own NAS means choices are there again.” By leveraging the robust ZFS file system, these DIY systems can utilize a diverse mix of drives without being limited by size constraints. This flexibility allows for more efficient storage management and the potential for future upgrades.
The timing of this shift couldn’t be more urgent. As Synology removes essential features like hardware transcoding—crucial for personal media servers—enthusiasts are seeking alternatives that offer greater control and functionality. The recent loss of HEVC support has left many users frustrated, as they now face the burden of increased CPU workload for video streaming, a task that could be easily handled by a discrete GPU.
In response to these challenges, many users are exploring various operating systems tailored for NAS setups. Options like TrueNAS, Rockstor, and HexOS are gaining traction, providing users with the freedom to run their desired applications without restrictive limitations. The former Synology user expressed excitement at the possibilities, stating, “I like having options, and all of these let me run programs how I want to.”
Storage space is also a pressing concern. The six-bay configuration of existing Synology units is proving insufficient for many users’ needs. While Synology offers expansion options, these come at a high cost—around $500 for just five additional drive bays—while still imposing the same restrictive policies. Users are finding that building their own NAS is not only more cost-effective but also a sustainable solution as they can repurpose older hardware.
The demand for more storage is further amplified as users seek to create dual-tier systems—an all-flash NAS for active data combined with a larger hard drive-based unit for long-term storage. This setup enhances efficiency, allowing users to work seamlessly while managing their data effectively.
Furthermore, with an increased focus on eco-friendly solutions, some users are considering integrating solar power and battery storage into their new NAS builds, highlighting an innovative approach to sustainable technology.
The movement away from Synology is indicative of a larger trend among tech-savvy consumers who prioritize control, flexibility, and cost-effectiveness in their storage solutions. As this DIY revolution unfolds, those looking to enhance their data management capabilities are encouraged to explore building their own NAS systems.
As this situation develops, users are urged to weigh their options carefully and consider the long-term benefits of custom NAS solutions. The landscape of personal data storage is rapidly changing, and now is the time to take action if you find yourself constrained by existing limitations.
Stay tuned for further updates as this trend evolves.