As the United States approaches the transition to standard time on November 2, 2023, lawmakers are intensifying efforts to establish permanent daylight saving time. This year’s clock change, which involves falling back an hour, may mark the last time many Americans will experience this shift if proposed legislation gains traction.
Several members of Congress are advocating for a permanent switch to daylight saving time, with two primary bills under consideration. These legislative efforts aim not only to keep the nation on daylight saving time year-round but also to grant states the authority to decide their own time observance. As of early September, four bills related to this issue are pending in Congress, two of which seek to implement year-round daylight saving time.
The Sunshine Protection Act is at the forefront of this movement. Originally introduced by former Senator Marco Rubio of Florida, the act has garnered bipartisan backing over the years. In its latest iteration, Vern Buchanan (R-FL) has reintroduced the House version, while Senator Rick Scott (R-FL) has taken the lead in the Senate. Historically, the act has received significant support; for instance, in 2021, it passed the Senate with bipartisan approval but stalled in the House.
The current version of Buchanan’s bill has seen support from more than two dozen Republican representatives. Among the cosponsors are notable figures such as Rep. Mackenzie, Ryan (R-PA), Rep. Fitzpatrick, Brian K. (R-PA), and Rep. Carter, Earl L. “Buddy” (R-GA). Their backing reflects a growing consensus among certain lawmakers that the time change is unnecessary and disruptive.
In the Senate, Scott’s version of the Sunshine Protection Act has attracted a diverse coalition of supporters, including both Democrats and Republicans. Key supporters include Sen. Patty Murray (D-WA), Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR), and Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR). The Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation held a hearing on this bill in April, where it advanced out of committee but still requires a revote to comply with Senate procedures.
Despite these legislative efforts, the clock change scheduled for November 2 remains on course unless Congress acts swiftly. The potential for permanent daylight saving time signifies a significant shift in how Americans experience daylight throughout the year. Proponents argue that keeping the clocks set forward would enhance evening daylight, potentially benefiting various sectors, including retail and leisure.
The debate over daylight saving time is not merely a matter of convenience; it touches on broader themes of health, productivity, and energy usage. Advocates for permanent standard time argue that it may be more beneficial for human health, while supporters of daylight saving time tout its advantages for outdoor activities and economic stimulation.
As the clock change approaches, the future of daylight saving time remains uncertain. Lawmakers will need to act decisively to ensure that this biannual ritual becomes a thing of the past.