A federal judge has ordered the city of Asheville, North Carolina, to pay compensation to five white residents following a discrimination lawsuit. The lawsuit arose after the residents claimed they faced racial discrimination when they were denied positions on a volunteer board that advises the city on matters of equity.

According to a statement from the advocacy group WNC Citizens for Equality, the Human Relations Commission of Asheville implemented application procedures that effectively excluded white individuals from serving on the board unless they could demonstrate a “plus factor.” This requirement included specific criteria, such as identifying as gay, transgender, or residing in public housing.

The judge’s ruling underscores significant implications for the city’s approach to diversity and inclusion initiatives. The plaintiffs argued that the commission’s practices were discriminatory and violated their rights by creating barriers based on race.

In a formal statement, the city acknowledged the ruling and expressed its commitment to ensuring equitable participation for all residents in advisory roles. The city emphasized the importance of inclusivity and stated that it would review its policies and practices to ensure compliance with federal guidelines on equal opportunity.

The decision marks a notable moment in Asheville’s ongoing efforts to address equity and representation within its community. As discussions on race and inclusion continue to evolve across the United States, Asheville’s case serves as a reminder of the complexities surrounding these issues.

Legal experts suggest that this ruling may set a precedent for other municipalities facing similar challenges. The case reflects broader national conversations regarding equity in public service and the implications of affirmative action policies.

The city is expected to provide details on the compensation amount and the next steps in the coming weeks. Meanwhile, community members and advocacy groups are likely to monitor how Asheville will implement necessary changes to its volunteer board application processes.

As the city navigates this outcome, it faces the challenge of balancing the need for diverse representation with the principles of fairness and equality for all residents, regardless of race or background.